← All reviews
First Solar

First Solar Review (Philippines): A Utility-Scale Brand, Not a Rooftop Option

Published specifications for the Series 6 and Series 7 (CdTe thin film). A brand ships several series, so these figures describe this model and not every product the manufacturer sells.

Rated power
Around 525 W (Series 7)
Cell technology
Cadmium telluride thin filmFundamentally different from the crystalline silicon that dominates residential solar. Engineered and marketed for multi-megawatt projects, not roofs.
Module efficiency
18.8-19.7%Respectable for thin film, but below the 21-24% now common on premium crystalline modules. Thin film needs more surface area for the same output.
Product warranty
not publishedNot stated in the sources we checked. Modules are sold at project level to utility buyers, not through a retail channel.
Performance warranty
30 yearsWith warranted degradation as low as 0.3% per year, a genuine technical strength of the CdTe format.
Philippine channel
None for residentialNo residential distributor, dealer or rooftop channel we could find. Philippine installer listings name the country utility-scale farms, none name First Solar as a supplier.
Global reference price
Roughly 0.40-0.70 US dollars per wattPriced and sold at project level, not through the channels that set Philippine residential pricing.

Source: First Solar Series 7. Checked 2026-09-28. Manufacturers revise specifications between series without notice — confirm the figures for the exact model you are quoted before you pay.

What it does well

  • Better temperature performance and lower degradation than many crystalline panels, which are real advantages in a hot climate.
  • A warranted degradation rate as low as 0.3% per year over a 30-year performance warranty.
  • A well-regarded manufacturer with a substantial utility-scale track record, so the technology itself is not in question.

Where it falls short

  • No residential product and no Philippine residential channel, so for a homeowner this is a mismatch rather than a quality problem.
  • Efficiency of 18.8-19.7% against 21-24% on premium crystalline panels, and thin film needs more area for the same output, which is the wrong trade on a space-constrained roof.
  • A form factor built for open ground-mount fields rather than roofs, and pricing set at project level, so an installer offering it for a home system is unusual enough to question the sourcing.
Compare against the other 29 panels we have reviewed

How the Series 6 and Series 7 (CdTe thin film) compares with the other panels we have reviewed. Listed in no particular order — this puts published figures side by side, it does not pick a winner. Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Series 6 and Series 7 (CdTe thin film) compared with the other panels reviewed on this site
ModelRated powerModule efficiencyProduct warrantyPerformance warranty
Series 6 and Series 7 (CdTe thin film) this reviewAround 525 W (Series 7)18.8-19.7%—30 years
Tiger Neo N-type (72HL4 series)555–575 W—12–15 years30 years to 87.4%
Vertex S+ TSM-NEG9R.28430–460 WUp to 23.0%25 years30 years
HiKu / BiHiKu / TOPHiKu6 lineup560–600 WUp to 22.6%12–25 years30 years, linear
Hi-MO 6 and Hi-MO 7—Hi-MO 6 up to 22.8% · Hi-MO 7 around 23.3%12–15 yearsHi-MO 6 25 years to ~84.8% · Hi-MO 7 30 years
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+415–440 WUp to 22.5%25 years25 years to 90.58%
Neostar 2S / 2P (ABC)440–520 WUp to 23.5–24.3%15 years30 years, linear
DeepBlue 4.0 Pro (and 3.0)475 W (DeepBlue 4.0 Pro)4.0 Pro about 22.7% · 3.0 about 19.5–21.3%4.0 Pro 25 years · 3.0 12 years4.0 Pro 30 years to ~87.4% at year 25 · 3.0 25 years
Maxeon 7—Up to about 24%40 years40 years to over 88%
JW-HD108N / HD144N / JW Max445–715 W———
575 W bifacial N-type575 WAbout 22%——
Current mainstream lines—Roughly 20–22.5%15 years25–30 years
CMD-144 series and Meteor CME-132BDS575-595 W (CMD-144), 700-725 W (Meteor CME-132BDS)—30 years30 years
Astro N series (n-type TOPCon)————
PERC, N-type TOPCon and N-type HJT lines425-530 W mainstream residential TOPCon, to 660 W class bifacial21.8-24.5% mainstream TOPCon, up to 24.6%12 years25 years PERC, 30 years TOPCon bifacial
n-type TOPCon range————
PERC, bifacial, HJT and n-type TOPCon range385-730 W across the range———
Heterojunction (HJT) modules————
LP182*182-M-72-NB (N-type TOPCon)565-585 W21.86-22.64%—30 years linear
N-type TOPCon range————
EverVolt (HJT), discontinued 2025—Roughly 19-21%——
PERC, bifacial, HJT and n-type TOPCon range400-730 W across the range———
Alpha Pure-R and Alpha Pure-RX—Roughly 21.9-22.6%25 years25 years
Titan series, with a separate Hyper-ion HJT line—Around 21.8% mainstream, Titan topping out around 21.7%15 years on current lines30 years on current lines
Tangra series (n-type TOPCon)————
Maxeon back-contact modules—Low-to-mid 20% range——
SPDG585-600W-N144M10 (SPDG bifacial series)585-600 W in this bin22.64-23.22%15 years30 years linear
TOPCon residential rangeRoughly 395 W up to large-format commercial modulesAround 22%, up to about 23.2% on higher-end SKUs12 years25 years monofacial, 30 years bifacial
N-type TOPCon own-brand modules————
Monocrystalline half-cut PERC range, many bifacial360-700 W across residential and commercial linesRoughly 20.5-22.5%10-12 years25 years standard, 30 years bifacial

Dashes are figures the manufacturer does not publish, not zeros. Where two products differ on a spec, which one matters depends on your roof and your usage — a higher efficiency panel earns its premium on a small roof and rarely on a large one.

First Solar is a real, well-regarded manufacturer — but it doesn’t sell a residential product, and we found no evidence of a Philippine residential channel. If you’re comparing panels for a home rooftop, this brand isn’t a realistic option; skip it and look at the Tier-1 crystalline brands instead.

What First Solar actually makes

First Solar builds cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film panels — a fundamentally different technology from the crystalline silicon panels that dominate residential solar (the kind made by Canadian Solar, Jinko, Trina, and the other brands in this lineup). Its current flagship products, the Series 6 and Series 7 modules, are engineered and marketed specifically for large commercial and utility-scale solar farms, not rooftops. That’s not a knock on the technology — CdTe thin-film has real advantages in hot climates, including better temperature performance and lower degradation than a lot of crystalline panels — but the company builds and sells it in a form factor and business model aimed at multi-megawatt projects.

Lineup and specs

Series 7 modules run around 18.8-19.7% module/cell efficiency at roughly 525W per panel, respectable for thin-film but noticeably lower than the 21-24% efficiency now common among premium crystalline Tier-1 and premium panels. Because thin-film needs more surface area to produce the same output, it’s a poor fit for space-constrained residential roofs even if you could source it. First Solar does cite a strong warranted degradation rate — as low as 0.3% annually over a 30-year performance warranty — which is a genuine technical strength of the CdTe format.

Local availability

We could not find any evidence of a residential distributor, dealer, or rooftop-focused channel for First Solar in the Philippines. Searches of Philippine solar company directories and installer listings turn up the country’s major utility-scale solar farms and rooftop installers, but none name First Solar as a supplier. That doesn’t rule out the possibility that First Solar modules have gone into a utility project here through a project-specific procurement deal — large solar farms source globally and don’t always publicize every supplier — but for a homeowner shopping for a rooftop system, there is no verifiable path to buying First Solar panels in the Philippines today.

Price

Not applicable for a residential quote. Reported global reference pricing for First Solar modules runs roughly $0.40-0.70 per watt, priced and sold at a project level for utility buyers rather than through the retail/installer channels that set the ₱45,000-80,000 per kW installed pricing typical of Philippine residential systems. If an installer somehow offers you First Solar for a home system, treat that as unusual and ask hard questions about sourcing before proceeding.

Where it falls short

For a homeowner, this is a straightforward mismatch rather than a quality problem: lower efficiency than residential-focused panels, a form factor built for open ground-mount fields rather than roofs, and no confirmed local retail or installer channel. The brand’s real strengths — thermal performance, low degradation, at scale — are utility-scale advantages that don’t translate into value on a typical Philippine roof.

Who it’s best for

Realistically, nobody shopping for a home rooftop system. First Solar is worth knowing about if you’re evaluating who supplied panels for a utility-scale project you’ve read about, but not as a brand to request a quote for. For an actual residential purchase, compare crystalline Tier-1 brands instead — see our best solar panel brands guide and tier-1 vs tier-2 panels guide, and check our panel brand roundup for options like Canadian Solar or Jinko Solar that have real Philippine residential channels.

Solar panel brands with a Philippine channel

If First Solar is off the table because nobody local carries it, these are the solar panel brands where we found a named Philippine party — a distributor, an official storefront, or a local manufacturer — that a warranty claim could actually be put to.

Brands with a confirmed Philippine supply channel, listed alphabetically. This records availability, not quality.
BrandAvailable throughOur review
AIKOEcoSolutions, certified distributor—
JA SolarIAN Solar—
JinkoIAN Solar and PhilSolarread
JolywoodPhotonergy—
Q CELLSSolaready—
SeraphimPhotonergyread
TCL SolarPhotonergy—
TongweiSungrid Energy—

Channels last verified 2026-08-16. Distribution agreements lapse without notice — we have already seen one distributor drop three brands and another let its site go dark — so confirm the brand is still carried before you pay for anything. A brand missing from this table has not been confirmed as unavailable; it means we have not verified a channel for it, which is a different claim. Where we have verified that a brand has no local channel, it has its own review saying so.

Get free quotes for your home

Tell us your monthly bill and we’ll help you find quotes — no obligation.

Get quotes using First Solar
/ month
₱1,500₱25,000+
System size
5kW
Price range
₱250k–400k
Monthly savings
₱6,500
Payback
~3.2–5.1yrs

Estimate only — actual price depends on your roof, brand, and installer. Expect realistic bill reduction of ~90%+, not 100%. Final numbers come from an installer’s own site survey.

Step 1 of 3 — Your estimate

What’s your roof like, and where are you located?

Helps installers scope your system and mounting correctly. No commitment.

Where should installers send your quotes?

Last step — takes about 20 seconds.

We help you find quotes — not a call center. No spam calls, no fee to you. Compare what comes back and choose, or walk away.

Free. No account needed. Takes about 60 seconds.

Get free quotes